A class action lawsuit has been filed against Grammarly, alleging the company used authors' content to train its AI models without consent, violating their privacy and publicity rights.
Why it matters
This lawsuit is crucial because it directly confronts the legal and ethical boundaries of using user-generated content for training AI models. Its outcome could establish significant precedents for data privacy, intellectual property rights, and consent requirements within the AI industry, potentially reshaping how AI companies acquire and utilize data for their product development globally. It highlights the growing tension between AI innovation and individual rights.
A journalist is suing Grammarly, claiming the company used her and other writers' work to train its AI without permission. This lawsuit highlights growing concerns about how AI companies use people's data and content, potentially setting new rules for data privacy and intellectual property in the AI world.
Europe is initiating measures to ban AI-generated child sexual abuse imagery, with a focus on content produced by tools like Elon Musk's xAI chatbot Grok.
Read on Economic Times Tech →Haryana is deploying three AI tools to enhance early detection, patient monitoring, and high-risk area identification for tuberculosis elimination.
Read on Economic Times Tech →The Goa government is set to unveil its AI and deep-tech policy within 100 days, aiming to foster local talent and develop indigenous technological solutions in line with Industry 5.0.
Read on Economic Times Tech →